Based on quantum number restrictions in atoms, what are...?
#(1)# the allowed values of #n# if #l = 2# and #m_l = 0# ?
#(2)# the allowed value(s) of #l# if #n = 2# and #m_l = -1# ?
#(3)# the allowed value(s) of #m_s# in an orbital an electron will be excited into?
#(4)# the allowed value(s) of #n# and #m_l# if #l = 0# ?
1 Answer
The main constraints you should remember about quantum numbers are:
#n = 1, 2, 3, . . . # , so#n > 0# is required.#l = 0, 1, 2, . . . , l_max# , where#0 <= l <= n-1# .#m_l = {-l, -l+1, . . . , l-1, l}# , meaning that#-l <= m_l <= l# .#m_s = pm1/2# , meaning that it cannot be otherwise.
And so, you should have these constraints in your head and cycle through them to see which ones you should pull up.
Keep in mind that
#m_s# is independent of which orbital you are in---it does not relate to what#n# ,#l# , or#m_l# happen to be.For
#l = 2# and#m_l = 0# , that gives you some sort of#d# orbital (namely, the#d_(z^2)# ), AND it specifies which#d# orbital for a given energy level#n# ... which actually isn't given.So, you can choose any
#n# you want, as long as#l <= n-1# . If you flip it around,#n >= l + 1# .Since
#l = 2# , the minimum#n# you can have is#n = 3# . Therefore, you can only have
#color(blue)(n = 3, 4, 5, . . . , N)# That corresponds to
#3d_(z^2)# ,#4d_(z^2)# , . . . ,#Nd_(z^2)# orbitals.
Here, you have
#n = 2# and#m_l = -1# , and we can freely ignore the value of#m_s# because it's a valid#m_s# . That corresponds to one of the orbitals on the second energy level.Since
#m_l# is constrained by#-l <= m_l <= l# , and it is given that#m_l = -1# , we know that#l# must be at least#1# (if#l = 0# , then#m_l < -l# , and that's not allowed). However, since#n = 2# and#l <= n-1# ,#l# can be at most#1# (otherwise#l > n-1# , which is not allowed).Therefore,
#color(blue)(l = 1)# .
Hopefully by now you've realized that
#m_s# is independent of what any of the other quantum numbers are. It's a property of an electron.And so,
#m_s# can be#color(blue)(pm1/2)# , whichever you want, so long as your orbital started out empty.
Here, we only have to focus on
#l = 0# . If#l = 0# , that must be an#s# orbital. But we know that there are many#s# orbitals, namely,#1s, 2s, 3s, . . . # , all the way to the#7s# as the latest known#s# orbital.As you now know,
#m_l# is restricted in range by the value of#l# , so since#l = 0# , we know that#pml = 0# as well and thus#m_l = {0}# , i.e.#m_l# has only one option and that is ZERO.And as we mentioned,
#n = 1, 2, 3, . . . # is fair game, so in the end, we have an infinity of choices of this PAIR of quantum numbers:
#(color(blue)(n), l, color(blue)(m_l), m_s)#
#= (color(blue)(1), 0, color(blue)(0), -1/2), (color(blue)(2), 0, color(blue)(0), -1/2), (color(blue)(3), 0, color(blue)(0), -1/2), . . . #