For the overall reaction #2X_2Y_2 + Z_2 -> 2X_2Y_2Z#, which of the following mechanisms is consistent with the rate law #r(t) = k[X_2Y_2][Z_2]#?
#A)#
#Z_2 -> 2Z# (slow)
#2Z + 2X_2Y_2 -> 2X_2Y_2Z# (fast)
#B)#
#X_2Y_2 + Z_2 -> X_2Y_2Z + Z# (slow)
#X_2Y_2 + Z -> X_2Y_2Z# (fast)
#C)#
#X_2Y_2 + Z -> X_2Y_2Z# (slow)
#X_2Y_2Z + Z -> X_2Y_2Z_2# (fast)
#D)#
#X_4Y_4 + Z_2 -> X_4Y_4Z + Z# (slow)
#X_2Y_2 + X_4Y_4Z -> X_2Y_2Z + X_4Y_4# (fast)
#E)#
#X_2Y_2 + Z_2 -> X_2Y_2Z + Z# (slow)
#X_2Y_2Z -> X_2Y_2 + Z# (fast)
#Z_2 -> 2Z# (slow)
#2Z + 2X_2Y_2 -> 2X_2Y_2Z# (fast)
#X_2Y_2 + Z_2 -> X_2Y_2Z + Z# (slow)
#X_2Y_2 + Z -> X_2Y_2Z# (fast)
#X_2Y_2 + Z -> X_2Y_2Z# (slow)
#X_2Y_2Z + Z -> X_2Y_2Z_2# (fast)
#X_4Y_4 + Z_2 -> X_4Y_4Z + Z# (slow)
#X_2Y_2 + X_4Y_4Z -> X_2Y_2Z + X_4Y_4# (fast)
#X_2Y_2 + Z_2 -> X_2Y_2Z + Z# (slow)
#X_2Y_2Z -> X_2Y_2 + Z# (fast)
2 Answers
A: It is the only one consistent with a first-order dependence on BOTH reactants.
Explanation:
B, C and D don't show how the second reactant changes (
It's
In a mechanism, the rate law can be approximated as the reactants in the slow step raised to their coefficients, since the slow step dominates the reaction time.
The Hess's Law-style cancellation can be seen:
#X_2Y_2 + Z_2 -> X_2Y_2Z + cancelZ# (slow)
#X_2Y_2 + cancelZ -> X_2Y_2Z# (fast)
#"----------------------------------------------"#
#2X_2Y_2 + Z_2 -> 2X_2Y_2Z#
#A# is incorrect because the slow step suggests a rate law of#r(t) = k[Z_2]# .#C# is incorrect because it doesn't cancel out to give the overall reaction.#D# is incorrect because the slow step doesn't contain#X_2Y_2# , and suggests a rate law of#r(t) = k[X_4Y_4][Z_2]# .#E# is incorrect because it doesn't contain the product, and the overall reaction is just a simple dissociation.