How does Bohr's model fail to account for atomic spectra of multi-electron atoms?
1 Answer
Essentially, the presence of a second electron changes the energy levels, which makes it so that for each
Bohr's model doesn't account for a single
For
#ul(" ") " " ul(" ") " " ul(" ") " " ul(" ") " " ul(" ") " " ul(" ") " " ul(" ") " " ul(" ") " " ul(" ")#
#" "" "underbrace(" "" "" "" "" ") " " underbrace(" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ")#
#3s" "" "" "3p" "" "" "" "" "" "" "3d#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#ul(" ") " " ul(" ") " " ul(" ") " " ul(" ")#
#" "" "underbrace(" "" "" "" "" ")#
#2s" "" "" "2p#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#ul(" ")#
#1s#
However, when we include a second electron, we include the effect of electron-electron repulsion.
Since electrons generally move very quickly, the repulsions are fast enough to influence the difference in energy levels for the above electron "shells".
Based on the type of shell label (
#" "" "" "" "" "" "" "ul(" ") " " ul(" ") " " ul(" ") " " ul(" ") " " ul(" ")#
#" "" "" "" "" "" "" "underbrace(" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ")#
#" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "3d#
#" "" "ul(" ") " " ul(" ") " " ul(" ")#
#" "" "underbrace(" "" "" "" "" ")#
#" "" "" "" "3p#
#" "#
#ul(" ")#
#3s#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "" "ul(" ") " " ul(" ") " " ul(" ")#
#" "" "underbrace(" "" "" "" "" ")#
#" "" "" "" "2p#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#ul(" ")#
#2s#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#" "#
#ul(" ")#
#1s#
(for this diagram, these are just relative energy differences.)
As a result, the simple
Since there are now energy "sublevels", the electromagnetic spectra of atoms is not so easily predicted unless one knows exactly how the energy levels have split.